Picture this: A Harvard graduate unleashing a scathing critique on the university's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, claiming they've pushed out a respected professor after decades of service. It's a story that's shaking the foundations of academia – and it might just make you question the future of higher education. But here's where it gets controversial: Is DEI truly a force for good, or is it sidelining merit in ways that could harm society? Stick around as we dive deeper into this heated debate.
Now, you can enjoy Fox News articles on the go with our convenient audio option!
Shabbos Kestenbaum, a proud Harvard alumnus, delivered a pointed rebuke of the university's DEI programs on Thursday, aligning his views with those of James Hankins, a longtime professor who recently departed after 40 years. 'It's shocking, but it’s certainly not surprising,' Kestenbaum remarked, contending that Harvard's adoption of DEI has prioritized ideological agendas over genuine merit-based achievements.
His comments mirrored the grievances Hankins expressed in an essay published in Compact Magazine. Hankins, who retired in 2021 following a surge of 'wokeness' and stringent COVID-19 protocols, honored a four-year retirement agreement that concluded just weeks ago. In his piece, he lamented Harvard's shift away from merit-driven criteria, arguing that DEI emphases have revamped hiring and admissions processes, effectively sidelining the exploration of Western civilization.
As a quick aside for those new to this topic, DEI stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion – it's meant to promote fairness and representation, but critics like these argue it can sometimes lead to reverse discrimination, favoring certain groups over others based on identity rather than skills or accomplishments. For example, imagine a job opening where candidates are evaluated not just on their qualifications but on how they fit a diversity quota; it might sound inclusive, but it could overlook the most talented individual, potentially weakening the institution as a whole.
Intriguingly, DEI and woke ideologies seem to be waning under the current political climate, but could they make a comeback with a fresh rebranding? That's the question raised in related discussions.
A photo captures banners draped across Memorial Church on the Harvard campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, dated Tuesday, May 27, 2025, symbolizing the tensions on display.
In his essay, Hankins detailed his decision to leave amid the rising tide of progressive ideologies and pandemic restrictions, yet he fulfilled his commitment to the university.
He voiced strong disapproval of what he saw as Harvard's rejection of meritocracy, claiming that DEI initiatives have reshaped key academic functions, diminishing the focus on Western heritage and its contributions to global knowledge. For beginners wondering why this matters, Western civilization encompasses the historical, philosophical, and cultural developments from ancient Greece and Rome through modern times, influencing everything from democracy to science. Critics fear that de-emphasizing it in education could leave students without a full understanding of their heritage, much like skipping the foundation chapters of a history textbook.
Meanwhile, the iconic Harvard University coat of arms, featuring 'Ve Ri Tas' (Veritas, meaning truth), adorns the front of the Harvard Business School building in Boston, Massachusetts, a symbol of the institution's storied past.
Kestenbaum echoed Hankins' sentiments during an appearance on 'Fox & Friends' with guest host Dr. Nicole Saphier, warning that a society neglecting its history faces an uncertain tomorrow.
'Societal consequences are my biggest worry, especially the disheartenment affecting America's youth,' he explained.
And this is the part most people miss: When cultural influencers or educators tell young people their heritage isn't worth cherishing, their background is a source of shame, or their nation's story lacks scholarly value, it can lead to deep disconnection, particularly among young men. This demoralization might manifest as apathy or even rebellion against societal norms they're supposed to embrace.
He emphasized the importance of celebrating and teaching the strengths of Western civilization – values like innovation, liberty, and individual achievement that have shaped the world – rather than dismissing them for imported philosophies.
'Discrimination against White individuals, Asians, and anti-American sentiments peddled in colleges have been an open secret for years,' Kestenbaum added, sparking even more debate. Is this callout justified, or does it overlook the real harms of systemic inequalities? Some might argue that DEI counters historical disadvantages, while others see it as itself discriminatory. What are your thoughts? Does highlighting these narratives help or hinder progress?
For more on media and culture, check out our dedicated coverage.
Harvard has yet to issue a statement in response to Fox News Digital's inquiry.
Download the Fox News app for the latest updates.
Fox News' Peter D'Abrosca contributed to this article.
Taylor Penley serves as an associate editor at Fox News.
So, what's your take? Do you agree that DEI is undermining merit at elite universities, or do you see it as a necessary correction? Share your opinions in the comments below – let's spark a meaningful conversation!
